Education

Reports

Filter Reports

Programme

Author

Document Type

Collection

This is the library of all our published reports and insights.

If you have any questions about a particular report, please tweet the Education team @GatsbyEd or email us info@gatsby.org.uk.

Disclaimer: The Gatsby Charitable Foundation commissions and funds research which contributes to the strengthening of the country’s science and engineering skills. The views and opinions presented in the research reports do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Gatsby Charitable Foundation.

Secondary Teachers' Views on Post-18 Options for Students

Secondary Teachers' Views on Post-18 Options for Students

In June 2019, Gatsby commissioned Pye Tait Consulting to undertake a short piece of research to gather the views of secondary teachers on post-18 options available to students. Key issues which this research sought to address are: · The level of understanding of higher education routes amongst secondary teachers; · Views on how students should be informed of post-18 options; · Important influencers on students when making decisions on post-18 routes; · How students gather information about post-18 options

The missing middle: higher technical education in England

The missing middle: higher technical education in England

Against the backdrop of the Post-18 Review of Education and Funding and the Review of Level 4 and 5 Education, this report was commissioned by Gatsby to explore how the higher technical education system in England reached the point where it is today and how current provision compares with other countries. Authored by Simon Field, a leading independent expert on country skills systems, the report draws on history and international comparisons.

Level 4 and 5 provision in England: provider perspectives

Level 4 and 5 provision in England: provider perspectives

In January 2018, we commissioned York Consulting to undertake a qualitative study on providers’ perspectives about Level 4 and 5 provision in England. This report describes the views of 23 higher education providers (including further education colleges, universities, and alternative providers) on the viability of Level 4 and 5 provision; labour market and employer influences on Level 4 and 5 provision; and providers’ approaches to widening participation at Levels 4 and 5.

Load More